[Editor's Note: This is a back-dated blog post to clearer-thinking days of December, 2008]
Sometimes, cool things just happen. I was walking the mean streets of Santa Monica tonight, headed to the gym, enjoying all the scenery that SoCal has to offer. The Think Tank has determined that outside of NYC, there is no finer collection of beautiful women. Even so, my mind began to wander. Where it landed was disconcerting.
Whiskey Frankie Rating = 0
Seriously, completely sober when I thought of this.![]()
So, I wonder… let’s say that The Think Tank, Lemme Kilmister and Chris Robinson are at the Rainbow Room on Sunset on a random Tuesday night. We got locked in the upstairs bathroom. A fight between Robinson and Lemmy breaks out, over a girl (what else would these two ever get in a fight over???). As usual, The Think Tank is an innocent bystander. Who wins?
Speed and agility: A key category in close confines. Robinson is wafer thin, presumably smaller than most the girls I know. Signature moves include high-stepping back peddling and loose hips. Lemme represents more of a stationary brawler. Often sans sleeves. The bigger guy usually wins here.
Advantage: Lemmy
Intoxification: It’s very likely Robinson would be smoked out of his mind. Lemmy admittedly drinks “continuously through the day.” Robinson would likely be a pacifist unless he freaks out. Lemmy is likely in a violent mood. I’m not sure there’s a clear advantage here. Both would be very impaired. Likely a battle of attrition.
Advantage: Draw
Intimidation: Nothing could be as terrifying as the prospect of Lemmy screaming “ACE OF SPADES!” at you from inches away. This also works on transvestite prostitutes from your car window at the del Taco off Santa Monica Blvd. in Hollywood. Anyways, Robinson’s rock anthem tactics would be confined to “Remedy Remedy Remedy Remedy!” Not quite on par.
Advantage: Lemmy
Menecing Facial Hair: Both have sported multiple looks throughout the years. I’ve seen Robinson in pig tails, but his most common look is the pseudo-hippie-jesus look. When you think about it, it would be somewhat freaky to actually do physical harm to someone who looked like the mesiah. Might cause some unintended hesitiaton. Lemme’s signature look is a think black beard, but with a clean-shaven chin. Intimidating, but not in a psychological sense.
Advantage: Draw

On an unrelated side note, here are some interesting (but maybe not true) facts about Kilmister.
Experience: Aka, age factor. Plus brawling expertise. Lemme was born in 1945. Robinson 20 years his junior, in 1966. Physical endurance probably not a strong suit for either.
Advantage: Draw
Indulgence and excessiveness: Key elements in a spontaneous combustion type situation where anything can happen. Lemmy once threatened to put a screw driver through someone’s knee camp for suggesting he was gay. No need to go on.
Advantage: Lemmy
Most likely to watch Fight Club: Lemme probably threw a whiskey bottle through his TV screen.
Advantage: Robinson
Elusiveness and cunning: Lemme has a wicked british accent, growly voice and has admittedly scored with 1,200 women. He’s been rocking since the 1960s and was once a roadie for Jimi Hendrix. Probably picked up a thing or two about survival along the way. Robinson somehow wooed Kate Hudson.
Advantage: Robinson
With the last three key categories Robinson makes an epic comeback, and in my mind and by my math, this is now a draw.
The Think Tank OUT.


Right on about ‘Right On’
Posted in social commentary, story telling with tags Right On, Sorry I party on July 10, 2009 by Frank TadychWhiskey Frankie Rating = 0
High and Dry, but not like Radiohead
Everyone has a catch phrase. Even if they don’t mean to. They’re simple, effecient and often excuse the need for actual listening or effort for conversations we don’t want to be invovled in. A wonderful evolution of the english language.
Case in point, the recommended and official catch phrase of The Think Tank is “Sorry I party.” Surprised? No, probably not.
To note:
Person: “Tank, last night was awsome man. Best time ever.”
Tank: “Sorry I party!!” (evokes coolness and acknowledgement of elite fun status)
Person: “Tank, you look like crap, man. How was your weekend?”
Tank: “Sorry I party?” (evokes complete lack of recognition)
Person: “Tank, you should not have said that to my girlfriend, dude. NOT cool.”
Tank: “Sorry I party dude.” (evokes feeling of remorse)
As such, said catch phrase of The Think Tank headquarters works in nearly every context. We’ve found very few were those three little words don’t suffice.
Similarly, we’ve come across another highly recommended and vague catch phrase — see useful — from good friend Chewey that has the ability to absolve from reponsibility, suggest actual interest via a response but also remove yourself from making an opinion and all while saying something but nothing really at all. The lack of understanding generally leaves people with nothing else to say, thus ending conversation in a comfortable but unfished manner.
Right on!
Person: “I really love that new Nickleback song”
Tank: “Right on.” (I hate Nickleback leave me the fuck alone)
Person: “Did you see Public Enemies yet? I loved it.
Tank: “Right on man.” (I did, but don’t want to talk to you about it)
Person: “Man, it’s gorgeous out today.”
Tank: “Right on.” (yep or general agreement)
Peson: “Wow. Last night was unbelievable.”
Tank: “Right on!”
The Think Tank out.
1 Comment »